NIFL standings data incorrect again?! LOL!

The National Indoor Football League (NIFL) forum
Post Reply
User avatar
ChampionOfSteel
Site Admin
Posts: 867
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:58 am

NIFL standings data incorrect again?! LOL!

Post by ChampionOfSteel » Mon May 15, 2006 1:17 pm

Osceola is 6-3?
I got them at 4-3.

Dayton is 2-4?
I got them at 2-3.
Damn, I didn't realize Dayton played six games?

Palm Beach is 1-4?
I got them at 1-3.

Here's my calculations: http://home.columbus.rr.com/cfrankings/standings.fil

Have we started to secretly award forfeits for games postponed/not played?

Can someone fill me in on what's going on?
If you don't let the people with the money know you prefer the NIFL game system, you won't see any stable leagues copying the NIFL game system for your enjoyment!

Speak up!

Marshal! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PbIlQYR1Qs LAAAAAWWWWWW!!!!
Top
thorgsd
Site Admin
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 5:28 pm

Post by thorgsd » Mon May 15, 2006 3:12 pm

ChampionOfSteel wrote:Have we started to secretly award forfeits for games postponed/not played?
Hmmmmm games postponed/not played...Kinda the NIFL's version of "no, honey your goldfish isn't dead. He always float on the top when he's taking a nap". No field...you forfeit. You get credited with a loss.
And make no mistake, it is not a benefit to a team to sit out a game. Too much rust starts to form on a team that needs to work on continuity and chemistry. You can only do so much in inter-squad games.
Top
outlaw1
Site Admin
Posts: 36
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 12:56 pm

records

Post by outlaw1 » Mon May 15, 2006 3:14 pm

Osceola has two wins via forfeit. (WP and Dayton). That's where the confusion comes in.
Top
outside source
Site Admin
Posts: 81
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 6:17 pm

Post by outside source » Mon May 15, 2006 3:16 pm

The NIFL did sneak in a couple of forfeits when nobody was looking.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “NIFL”