OSC

OSC message Boards

As the home for independent and minor league sports, OurSports Central's message boards are the perfect place to discuss your favorite teams and leagues with other fans, players and team and league administrators. Our boards cover all the leagues represented on OSC including independent and minor league baseball, indoor and Arena football, outdoor and indoor lacrosse, mens and womens basketball, junior and minor league hockey, outdoor and indoor soccer and more. Before posting for the first time, please consult our FAQ. Contact us with any questions.

OurSports Central independent and minor league sports


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21   IP: 64.233.195.202
Old 06-20-2008, 08:16 PM
tops804 tops804 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,613
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pounder View Post
There were 17 teams in the 1991-92 season.

By 2000...

Connecticut, Fort Wayne, Gary, Grand Rapids, Idaho, La Crosse, Quad City, Rockford, Sioux Falls, Yakima. 10 teams. WAY spread out. No TV, except the occasional local broadcast. Four of those teams didn't survive Thomas... and Idaho spent a year in the ether.

At least most of those cities are close to major airports (from which the cheaper flights are usually found). Flying into Montana or Minot is crazy expensive, and bussing in during winter is no picnic. Not that Pikeville is easy...
Seems to me that BET was going to show games (beginning with the 2001
All-Star game) but that obviously never happened. With so many ESPN's
out there, I always thought it was too bad they couldn't go back to their
roots once in a while.

The league still plans it's so-called, Caribbean Summitt, next week. If they
try to pull anything that the owners in the states don't like, I wonder if the
PBL will start getting calls.

This league is still suffering the D-League pickover, and obviously the groups
purchasing multiple teams didn't work. Whatever happened to the return
of the Indiana Alley Cats? Where the CBA is hurting itself, and becoming ABAish.
They are not telling anyone, anything.
__________________
Adios, OSC message boards. (2007-2017)

Last edited by tops804; 06-20-2008 at 08:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22   IP: 70.17.211.231
Old 06-21-2008, 08:18 AM
bectond bectond is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 714
Default

All I know is the CBA was in far worse shape two off-seasons ago. They only had two returning teams (Yakama and Albany), the Alley Cats (who drew flies), Pittsburgh (Still drawing flies) and FOUR Apex owned teams.

Which meant they only had five ownership groups, three of which (you can guess which ones) were not all that hot.

This off-season 4-5 teams will be returning, and RGV seems to be the only weak link. Last year the CBA had five or six dead weight ex-ABA franchises.
Those dead weight ABA escapee franchises are now opting for the PBL (which is a good thing for the long term survival of the CBA!). If the CBA focuses their future expansion on clustering in geographical areas (Say, add teams in Fargo, Brooklyn NY, Wichita Falls, Enid and Wenatchee) instead of wacky caribbean expansion ideas the league could survive if the length of the season were reduced. (48 games is too much).

The CBA has faced and over come far worse off seasons than this one.
__________________
Basketball Junkie and Rummikub Champion
Reply With Quote
  #23   IP: 75.182.78.52
Old 06-21-2008, 09:54 AM
DazedAndAmused DazedAndAmused is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bectond View Post
All I know is the CBA was in far worse shape two off-seasons ago. They only had two returning teams (Yakama and Albany), the Alley Cats (who drew flies), Pittsburgh (Still drawing flies) and FOUR Apex owned teams.

Which meant they only had five ownership groups, three of which (you can guess which ones) were not all that hot.

This off-season 4-5 teams will be returning, and RGV seems to be the only weak link. Last year the CBA had five or six dead weight ex-ABA franchises.
Those dead weight ABA escapee franchises are now opting for the PBL (which is a good thing for the long term survival of the CBA!). If the CBA focuses their future expansion on clustering in geographical areas (Say, add teams in Fargo, Brooklyn NY, Wichita Falls, Enid and Wenatchee) instead of wacky caribbean expansion ideas the league could survive if the length of the season were reduced. (48 games is too much).

The CBA has faced and over come far worse off seasons than this one.
Internally, the CBA may not be worse off than it was 2 or 3 years ago. But, they can't operate in a vacuum. That's the issue now. 2 or 3 years ago the economic situation was not the same. The affect on attendance is just one symptom. Operating costs will be much higher (in an already bad operating cost structure.) Sponsors will be harder to come by, and most importantly for the CBA, quality ownership groups will be few and far between.

That said, the PBL is not the savior of independent minor league basketball, and they have to weather the same storm. But, they have better positioned themselves with clustering of teams (relatively speaking) and shorter season. That may be good luck or good foresight... I don't know. If their vetting process (or associated controls) are solid, they may be all that we have, except for David Stern-subsidized ball.

Their last batch of added ABA defectors were not that bad (eg, Vt, Manchester) so I don't think that's an issue. (The CBA courted those teams too.)
Reply With Quote
  #24   IP: 71.182.184.169
Old 06-21-2008, 10:05 AM
psbf psbf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,884
Default

Bectond, you can say what you want about our attendence, but we had a couple of games where it improved and I would like to think that is a positive sign for us.
DandA, that's true about our economy. That will make it harder to draw more owners and fans with things being harder to purchase. As I said, I feel the Carribean idea is a mistake as well.
Reply With Quote
  #25   IP: 74.196.99.142
Old 06-22-2008, 03:06 PM
TEN TEN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 754
Default

Talked to someone very high up in CBA...he told me that the PBL is putting out a "offer you can't refuse" to new franchises....To be honest...I don't know how they would do it...They take care of all of your travel, uniforms, etc....all you have to do is pay the players and staff basically....and from what i understand no entry fee.....could that be right?

Boy they must have some pretty solid sponsors! I have a hard time believing that info!
Reply With Quote
  #26   IP: 67.186.76.15
Old 06-22-2008, 03:55 PM
JAKMAN JAKMAN is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71
Default

TEN, I don't doubt your information. I just don't understand why anybody would believe the PBL would pay all these costs in the middle on an economic meltdown.

If it sounds too good to be true, then it probably is.
Reply With Quote
  #27   IP: 71.51.138.229
Old 06-22-2008, 04:45 PM
Crystal Ball Crystal Ball is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 11
Default

Look for an announcement in the very near future of a completed merger between the CBA and PBL,a few details need to be worked out about front office titles and some issues with two person verus three person officiating and things of this nature.

The merger is going to happen,bottom line
Reply With Quote
  #28   IP: 71.182.184.169
Old 06-22-2008, 05:06 PM
psbf psbf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,884
Default

Very interesting! That would explain all the lack of official news lately. But I agree that this 'it's on me' deal from the PBL does seem unreal. Especially with gas prices so being so high.
So, I guess the merger will soon be official. I'm still cautious about it, though.
Reply With Quote
  #29   IP: 70.17.211.231
Old 06-22-2008, 05:18 PM
bectond bectond is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DazedAndAmused View Post
Internally, the CBA may not be worse off than it was 2 or 3 years ago. But, they can't operate in a vacuum.

That said, the PBL is not the savior of independent minor league basketball, and they have to weather the same storm. But, they have better positioned themselves with clustering of teams (relatively speaking) and shorter season. That may be good luck or good foresight... I don't know. If their vetting process (or associated controls) are solid, they may be all that we have, except for David Stern-subsidized ball.

Their last batch of added ABA defectors were not that bad (eg, Vt, Manchester) so I don't think that's an issue. (The CBA courted those teams too.)
IMO the CBA should not have attempted to recruit any of the teams the PBL cherry picked from the ABA this off-season. I’m not knocking the PBL, I just don’t believe the CBA should actively pursue existing teams that have not functioned under the umbrella of a structured stable basketball league. Those team owners may not understand the importance of collecting league dues, having a strong league executive or following international professional basketball rules. It would be akin to attempting to sell value to a consumer obsessed with price. A meal at Ruth Chris cost more than one Ruby Tuesday’s, which is more expensive than Wendy’s. Ruby Tuesday’s would be in a world of trouble if they failed to understand their place in the market and foolishly hired a Dairy Queen executive to improve their menu because Dairy Queen’s stock performed well last quarter (The cadet should have never been hired). Ruth Chris would not attempt to emulate Wendy’s approach to selling meat products or poach Wendy’s franchisees.

I’m attempting to illustrate that the D-League, CBA and PBL should all have different missions and each league should understand it’s place in the market. The CBA has to focus on strengthening the league brand. That is done by finding the right cities (has a professional arena with open weekend dates), where the entertainment options limited and strong ownership groups can be found. (By strong ownership groups, I’m referring to groups with 10-20 members that can share the cost of operating a franchise for years to come).

The PBL could become a fine alternative for many former ABA club owners because the PBL adds structure while retaining the confederate approach the ABA uses at a fraction of the cost of centralized basketball leagues (D-League and CBA).

The CBA missed the boat when they failed recruit the former USBL clubs. Those teams were familiar how a structured leagues operate, they could have been sold on value as opposed to price. As it stands now, the CBA should focus more on branding, if ex-ABA teams feel that the PBL is the right choice for them- cool. All that means is a lot of current franchise owners are beginning to understand their place in the market (Pittsburgh should be in the PBL because they can’t draw flies in a mid-major market), the CBA simply has to find new ownership groups that fit their mission or fold up the tent.
__________________
Basketball Junkie and Rummikub Champion
Reply With Quote
  #30   IP: 74.196.99.142
Old 06-22-2008, 05:48 PM
TEN TEN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 754
Default

The solid USBL teams (Dodge, Kansas, Oklahoma) didn't have much interest in playing in the CBA. Those teams realized the niche they were in playing during the summer worked best for them. Kept expenses down, kept the talent level up....not competing for dates and fan support with local colleges and high schools (would have lost that battle).

I still think a good viable spring/summer league where the players make around $500 a week plus room and board can be successful if run correctly.

Prime example of the player quality issue....DeAnthony Bowden wasn't good enough to make our Oklahoma squad last spring in free agent camp....ends up with a CBA Championship...

In the USBL, you could at least get some pretty dang good players to return your calls, even if you couldn't actually get them to Kansas or Oklahoma.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


                       
                                                   
                                                                                             
                           

Hapening ImgHappening Now