OSC

OSC message Boards

As the home for independent and minor league sports, OurSports Central's message boards are the perfect place to discuss your favorite teams and leagues with other fans, players and team and league administrators. Our boards cover all the leagues represented on OSC including independent and minor league baseball, indoor and Arena football, outdoor and indoor lacrosse, mens and womens basketball, junior and minor league hockey, outdoor and indoor soccer and more. Before posting for the first time, please consult our FAQ. Contact us with any questions.

OurSport Central independent and minor league sports


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   IP: 166.205.143.115
Old 01-21-2011, 08:21 PM
Pounder's Avatar
Pounder Pounder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland freaking Oregon!
Posts: 2,697
Default A long strange trip, but neither long nor particularly strange.

A Brian Quarstad piece today...

http://www.insidemnsoccer.com/2011/0...r-2011-season/

Quarstad has already tweeted an update saying that USSF voted down D-2 sanctioning for the NASL. They'll either have to compete as 3rd division, or, well, um... perhaps not at all.

I strongly suspect, unless Traffic wants to expand their shady agency dealings by supplying a whole league with talent they've signed, that this will all blow away with the breeze.

Not that this helps USL.
__________________
Mean Spirited Blogger #107
Reply With Quote
  #2   IP: 204.131.226.113
Old 01-24-2011, 06:04 PM
Sam Hill's Avatar
Sam Hill Sam Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,095
Default

Pounder? I just met 'er!

Sorry, I'm sure you've heard that one before.

I haven't kept up with all these goings-on, except peripherally, but now that I read back on what's been going on...man, that sounds like a mess, doesn't it?
__________________
Old enough to remember when bashing the ABA was fun.
Reply With Quote
  #3   IP: 99.111.219.81
Old 01-25-2011, 09:51 AM
preeths's Avatar
preeths preeths is offline
Administrator
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,453
Default

This makes indoor football look good in comparison.
__________________
OurSports Central - http://www.oursportscentral.com
OSC on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/oursportscentral
OSC on Twitter: http://twitter.com/osctoday
Reply With Quote
  #4   IP: 98.201.141.157
Old 01-27-2011, 04:29 PM
logoguru's Avatar
logoguru logoguru is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 240
Default

The new rules are arbitrary and stupid. 75% of teams must be in a market of 750,000 or more???? It makes no sense. Teams can be successful in a smaller market if they're the only game in town. Doesn't make sense. The Chico Rooks were fairly successful in their heyday and under these rules Chico *may not* be able to have a team *if* 7.5 of the teams are in big cities and Chico is #11.

The NASL will appeal. But they need to find financiers and more teams.
________
FriskyRose

Last edited by logoguru; 09-11-2011 at 10:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5   IP: 204.131.226.113
Old 01-27-2011, 05:39 PM
Sam Hill's Avatar
Sam Hill Sam Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,095
Default

Chico can't have a D2 team. There's nothing that says they can't have a team. They just can't have a D2 team. What league's Chico in now?

It makes absolute sense.
__________________
Old enough to remember when bashing the ABA was fun.
Reply With Quote
  #6   IP: 24.248.161.158
Old 01-28-2011, 01:18 AM
nksports nksports is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newton, KS (the land of Oz)
Posts: 3,618
Default just some pondering

I would think the net worth of the owner(s) would be a more important figure than the size of the metro area. According to a chart I looked up on Wikipedia (which is good for an in-the-ballpark figure), there are 68 metro areas 750,000 and above. El Paso is the smallest.

Now using the English FA Champions League as a comparison, if England can have 24 teams in its second division, then there should be 144 U.S. D-2 teams (it also means the MLS should expand to 120 teams). (Divide the population of England by the number of teams in the FA Champions league, then divide the population of the US by 2,143,383 -- the ratio of English population per Champions League teams).

It was telling that there were no standards listed for D3.

Now while all that number crunching may or may not be interesting to anybody, I wonder if the D2 standards are in place to try and identify possible MLS markets in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #7   IP: 72.222.218.40
Old 01-29-2011, 09:07 AM
Sam Hill's Avatar
Sam Hill Sam Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nksports View Post
Now using the English FA Champions League as a comparison, if England can have 24 teams in its second division, then there should be 144 U.S. D-2 teams (it also means the MLS should expand to 120 teams). (Divide the population of England by the number of teams in the FA Champions league, then divide the population of the US by 2,143,383 -- the ratio of English population per Champions League teams).
That completely ignores all the societal differences between the US and England and the presence of 122 other major league sports teams in our country that England doesn't have.

That's insane. We're not matchsticks, we're people in societies who act very different from each other.

You know what population is a predictor of? Traffic.

India has 1.2 billion people but only 14 teams in its top-flight soccer league. What are they doing wrong?
__________________
Old enough to remember when bashing the ABA was fun.
Reply With Quote
  #8   IP: 76.210.37.116
Old 01-29-2011, 10:18 PM
nksports nksports is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newton, KS (the land of Oz)
Posts: 3,618
Default

My good fellow, I am not advocating 260-some teams on the top two levels of the U.S. Soccer Pyramid. The Good Lord knows, we're having trouble finding a dozen teams that can survive D II play.
I agree with the spirit of many of the U.S. Soccer guidelines. But it seemed like in some areas U.S. Soccer was doing the same thing -- throwing out some numbers. Some of the guidelines are good -- 5,000-seat stadiums. Some were reaching -- I don't know how many people with $20 million in assets are even looking to own a soccer team.
If a solid owner wants to set up a team in Chico (or Dayton, Ohio, or Colorado Springs), why not give it a try? If the U.S. Soccer guidlines were applied to the NFL, who wants to be the one to tell Green Bay it has to move or fold?
Reply With Quote
  #9   IP: 96.253.79.182
Old 05-06-2011, 02:15 PM
mikeyratt mikeyratt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: right behind you
Posts: 63
Send a message via AIM to mikeyratt Send a message via Yahoo to mikeyratt
Default

Forwhat ever reason, the USSF wants nothing at all to do with the NASL, hence their exclusion from the US Open Cup. As soon as Traffic and the NASL dry up and go away, I strongly suspect the "standards" for second division soccer will either disappear altogether or be ignored.
Reply With Quote
  #10   IP: 152.132.10.71
Old 07-03-2013, 03:50 PM
Pounder's Avatar
Pounder Pounder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland freaking Oregon!
Posts: 2,697
Default

Funny to go back through this. Remember when NASL was toast?

They're at least turning out crowds at the level the USL's old A-League was at a few years ago, minus perhaps a Rochester / Montreal / Portland chart-topper, but only really Edmonton as a straggler.

Curious to find out (1) if Puerto Rico returns as scheduled and (2) if the Cosmos draw.
__________________
Mean Spirited Blogger #107
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Hapening ImgHappening Now