OSC

OSC message Boards

As the home for independent and minor league sports, OurSports Central's message boards are the perfect place to discuss your favorite teams and leagues with other fans, players and team and league administrators. Our boards cover all the leagues represented on OSC including independent and minor league baseball, indoor and Arena football, outdoor and indoor lacrosse, mens and womens basketball, junior and minor league hockey, outdoor and indoor soccer and more. Before posting for the first time, please consult our FAQ. Contact us with any questions.

OurSport Central independent and minor league sports


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11   IP: 70.182.252.150
Old 08-26-2015, 12:20 AM
nksports nksports is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newton, KS (the land of Oz)
Posts: 3,618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pounder View Post
It's not much, and this blog says as much. It's the people involved with FC Cincinnati who deserve, well, a certain fate or two.

http://www.bigsoccer.com/blog/2015/8...ti-soccer-warz
The guy writing the blog seems upset the FCC group has MLS ambitions. Yes, an NPSL team would probably not go head-to-head with a USL team (PDL maybe), but could co-exist and maybe even be able to strike a deal as either a reserve side or a place to loan reserve players.
Our local NPSL team plays in a stadium in a youth complex that maybe holds 500 with standing room or lawn chair room for the rest of the seating. But the NPSL has both summer college and semi-pro teams (ours is in the latter category). The league is still low on the totem poll and relatively low budget.
I'm no big fan of the Linder family for other reasons (mainly trying to keep the cabal that tries to keep Cincy "clean.") But for trying to start a business that may bring in jobs and revenue, Vaya Con Dios. They are trying to move into a 40,000-seat stadium (yes with artificial turf), but that says something right there.
Reply With Quote
  #12   IP: 184.101.17.204
Old 08-26-2015, 11:50 PM
Sam Hill's Avatar
Sam Hill Sam Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nksports View Post
The guy writing the blog seems upset the FCC group has MLS ambitions. Yes, an NPSL team would probably not go head-to-head with a USL team (PDL maybe), but could co-exist and maybe even be able to strike a deal as either a reserve side or a place to loan reserve players.
You can't loan amateur players.
__________________
Old enough to remember when bashing the ABA was fun.
Reply With Quote
  #13   IP: 152.132.10.71
Old 08-27-2015, 02:02 PM
Pounder's Avatar
Pounder Pounder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland freaking Oregon!
Posts: 2,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Hill View Post
You can't loan amateur players.
Unless you don't give a rip about NCAA eligibility... and kow-towing to the NCAA is the weakness of the system compared to the world.
__________________
Mean Spirited Blogger #107
Reply With Quote
  #14   IP: 204.131.226.113
Old 08-27-2015, 07:07 PM
Sam Hill's Avatar
Sam Hill Sam Hill is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pounder View Post
Unless you don't give a rip about NCAA eligibility... and kow-towing to the NCAA is the weakness of the system compared to the world.
No, US Soccer will not let you loan an amateur player. Whether they are an NCAA player or not.

It has eff-all to do with NCAA eligibility.

They won't process the loan and register the player with the next team. You can't loan an amateur player.
__________________
Old enough to remember when bashing the ABA was fun.
Reply With Quote
  #15   IP: 152.132.10.71
Old 08-28-2015, 03:53 PM
Pounder's Avatar
Pounder Pounder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland freaking Oregon!
Posts: 2,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Hill View Post
No, US Soccer will not let you loan an amateur player. Whether they are an NCAA player or not.
US Soccer won't allow it because they're afraid to challenge the NCAA orthodoxy.

It needs to be challenged. Of course, there's "follow the money" reasons why they don't. I also wonder if the modified ruling saying USSF only has monopoly power over the amateur side of the sport is a factor.
__________________
Mean Spirited Blogger #107
Reply With Quote
  #16   IP: 70.182.252.150
Old 08-28-2015, 04:06 PM
nksports nksports is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newton, KS (the land of Oz)
Posts: 3,618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pounder View Post
US Soccer won't allow it because they're afraid to challenge the NCAA orthodoxy.
That would be pretty easy to do at this point. The NCAA (the union ruling excepted) has been getting pummeled on all sides. Football players are now openly registering their names and nicknames as trademarks, preventing their own teams from using them unless they are paid.
The NCAA is looking like it will lose over whether athletes can be compensated for the use of their name and likeness.
FIFA via CONCACAF has threatened to declare the NCAA an outlaw league for a while, which would have major implications over what NCAA players can do. The issue: NCAA substitution rules (which, if brought in line with the rest of the world, would actually help NCAA soccer, since it would be easier for schools to start men's teams without major Title IX implications, since you would only have to carry between 15 to 18 players, instead of the current 20 to 25 needed for a viable program).
Reply With Quote
  #17   IP: 73.190.105.182
Old 08-29-2015, 01:18 PM
Pounder's Avatar
Pounder Pounder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland freaking Oregon!
Posts: 2,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nksports View Post
That would be pretty easy to do at this point. The NCAA (the union ruling excepted) has been getting pummeled on all sides. Football players are now openly registering their names and nicknames as trademarks, preventing their own teams from using them unless they are paid.
The NCAA is looking like it will lose over whether athletes can be compensated for the use of their name and likeness.
FIFA via CONCACAF has threatened to declare the NCAA an outlaw league for a while, which would have major implications over what NCAA players can do. The issue: NCAA substitution rules (which, if brought in line with the rest of the world, would actually help NCAA soccer, since it would be easier for schools to start men's teams without major Title IX implications, since you would only have to carry between 15 to 18 players, instead of the current 20 to 25 needed for a viable program).
That's not even the real issue. Schools have to carry 26 players or so (on, for the men, 9.9 scholarships) because they're only playing counting games in the fall, therefore they're playing 2 games a weekend. The proposal to extend the NCAA season to the spring is what would be helpful to take that roster down to 18-22, playing generally one game a week. 15 is way too low. Of course, count on the NCAA reducing the scholarship maximum to 9 or 8 or so if that happens.

The real issue- the $5 billion a year youth soccer industry, if I dare call it that. They love to bait parents with the possibility of earning that college scholarship. Look back at that scholarship limit to see the fundamental problem. Then there's championships to play for... when what's really needed is skills refined. Bigger and faster sounds nice for pointyball, but for real football, foot skills, agility, quickness, some guile, and the ability to see space in a fast-changing environment are requirements. Frankly, there's a half dozen MLS teams who get stuck on bigger/faster instead of what's needed.

What's really needed is for MLS youth academies (all teams have them now) to stop catering to kids who are using them as a springboard to college, feel the pressure to actually develop these kids, and do that. Some teams' academies are still pay-to-play. Among all the ways to monetize the teams, if there's one real wrong way, charging for the academy is it. There's still plenty of money to be made collecting from parents for the recreational programs, the "single digit" ages, etc. (not everyone has that consolidated, but for instance, Portland Timbers pretty much own youth soccer in the entire state of Oregon by now).
__________________
Mean Spirited Blogger #107
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Hapening ImgHappening Now