Well, I called it...

[exit322]

You know it's bad when I'm tooting my horn about the obvious.

Pirates 55-20; not the closest game they've played.

[ChampionOfSteel]

What exactly is the plan for fixing this issue? Are the CIFL guys still leaking info to you?

They obviously didn't/could not do anything about this issue during the season.

What are the higher ups in the CIFL defining the problem as?

[exit322]

The problem is exactly what I've said it is all year, and it's obvious to anyone that remotely pays attention. Port Huron is at a level so far above everyone else in the CIFL that it'll take a miracle for them to lose in this league, regardless of what rules they use.

[ChampionOfSteel]

The problem is exactly what I've said it is all year, and it's obvious to anyone that remotely pays attention. Port Huron is at a level so far above everyone else in the CIFL that it'll take a miracle for them to lose in this league, regardless of what rules they use.

I'm well aware of your stance as it being a parity issue with Port Huron being stacked. That wasn't what I was asking you.

The question was ...have you heard how the league is going to handle this for next year so it doesn't happened again? How do they see the problem? I've heard some rumored ideas on having age caps in place.

[exit322]

You'll have to ask them what they're going to do; I resigned in January, I don't know the CIFL's plans on fixing their errors from this season.

Better ownership screening will solve a lot of these problems.

[EIEIO]

I hear the CIFL is planning to implement the EIFL game system.

It is afterall, clearly superior.

[tony-o]

I had a feeling they would do that. It keeps the blowouts in tact, but you do get to see guys tossed over the wall and other senseless violence. That should attract the fans.