PDA

View Full Version : new article on the AAFL


Fran
06-05-2007, 02:53 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=klosterman/070605

AAFL planning spring fling in 2008
By Chuck Klosterman
Special to Page 2

Don Klosterman was a third-round draft pick of the Cleveland Browns in 1952, played quarterback in the CFL, was a key pioneer of the AFL, worked as an executive for the Oilers, Colts and Rams, and served as president for the USFL's L.A. Express. He was also -- as far as I can deduce -- completely unrelated to me (we don't even pronounce our names the same way). But when Don Klosterman died from a heart attack in 2000, I was periodically asked by strangers if we were somehow connected. Two weeks ago, this happened again via e-mail, this time by Don Klosterman's nephew (who, just to make this paragraph as complicated as possible, is also named Don Klosterman). However, his specific e-mail probably had more to do with marketing than with misplaced genealogy, evidenced by this particular line in his message:

"I'm working on a new football league I want to talk with you about."

I am not sure how many U.S. citizens are already familiar with the All American Football League; I'd never even heard of it. It was supposed to come into existence this year but was pushed back to 2008, when it will (theoretically) launch during the last week of April.

So -- yes -- this will be a spring football league.

There are some historical lessons that almost always prove true: Don't wage a ground war on two fronts. Don't impulsively buy a speedboat or a racehorse. Don't ask a woman who loves Tori Amos to tell you about her dreams. And do not stage professional football in spring. It does not matter that football is more popular in America than pancakes or puppies. There is some psychological (and I suspect meteorological) barrier that makes people uncomfortable with springtime pigskin. We unconsciously associate the advent of football with the dawn of autumn and the coming onset of winter; for whatever the reason, football games in the month of May always feel gratuitous and inauthentic. As such, history tells us that the AAFL is doomed. It might not matter what the league does or how it operates.

Yet this league intrigues me.

It intrigues me for many reasons, but principally for its unspoken, overriding philosophy: The AAFL is trying to be a professional version of college football. It's kind of like when Ford and Chevy decided to build cars that were almost like Hondas -- the AAFL is hoping to repackage previously existing elements into something that's simultaneously new and familiar, targeted solely at fans who aren't particularly interested in anything else.

"The intention," Don Klosterman tells me, "is to play in areas where there are two sports: football and spring football. These are places like Tennessee, where they cram 110,000 fans into UT games and turn away another 80,000 who want to get in. Or in Alabama, where they just had 92,000 show up for U of A's spring game."

The World Football League (1974-75) failed because it ran out of money (the league supposedly paid its MVPs in cash because nobody believed a WFL check would clear). The USFL (1983-85) failed because of franchise instability, one crushing court decision and -- somewhat paradoxically -- too much money distributed unequally (by late '84, New Jersey Generals owner Donald Trump basically controlled everything). The XFL failed because football was not its priority (the entire endeavor seemed depressing and sarcastic). However, the unifying element in all those failures was a desire to compete against the NFL, an aspiration that's fundamentally impossible; Mark Cuban's newly proposed UFL (a theoretical fall league owned by billionaires and comprised of second-tier NFL prospects) would never sustain national interest. But the AAFL has no intention of competing with anyone, and that might be its saving grace. Instead, it's trying to appeal to the kind of (typically Southern) dude who dreams of a universe where college football never ends.

"What will make this league different is the relationship it will have to the university system, and the fact that its players will be recognizable to fans," says AAFL acting commissioner Cedric Dempsey. "We will only go where the interest in spring football is already very, very intense. A place like Gainesville, Florida, is probably a make-or-break city." Other universities that have signed options to host games include Purdue, North Carolina State and the aforementioned universities in Knoxville and Tuscaloosa. AAFL clubs will use existing stadiums and facilities at each college.

Dempsey used to be president of the NCAA; he's 75 years old and looks like a more athletic version of H. Ross Perot. Just about everyone on the AAFL's board has some kind of long-standing relationship with major college athletics: The board includes Harvey Schiller (former SEC commissioner), Martin Massengale (former chancellor at Nebraska), Gene Corrigan (former AD at Notre Dame and ACC commissioner) and -- perhaps most interestingly -- an SEC football fanatic named Marcus Katz who got rich as a student loan executive ("There is big money in the student loan business," Dempsey tells me, and I am not surprised). Dempsey estimates that starting the league will require between $30 million and $50 million. He is hoping for either a six- or (preferably) eight-team league and anticipates that players will be paid salaries in the vicinity of $75,000 to $100,000. Open tryouts for the AAFL will begin in early July in Orlando, Fla.

According to Dempsey, the potential success of the AAFL will hinge on its ability to feel local: Every roster will include at least 15 players who played for either the host college or a rival school from the region. The franchise set in Tennessee would ideally sign someone like ex-Vols quarterback Casey Clausen; a team playing on the campus of N.C. State might hope to sign someone like former North Carolina Tar Heels quarterback Darian Durant, a player who would still feel familiar to anyone who followed Wolfpack football. I assume the proposed club at Purdue will aspire to lock down whatever Big 10 talent gets cut during NFL minicamps. There is, however, one curious caveat: You cannot play in the AAFL unless you have graduated from college. Players who have completed their college eligibility without receiving a diploma are not eligible; you actually need a four-year degree. "Many people feel the graduation issue will be our biggest hurdle," Dempsey says.

Of course, a bigger issue might be ownership: It's still not clear who will own these hypothetical teams. Dempsey mentioned using a "Green Bay model" of community shareholders, but that's more complicated than it sounds; for one thing, it necessitates convincing any given community that possessing a spring football franchise is something they all should want. It also appears there will be no income from television (in fact, these games might be shown on public access TV without commercials). All revenue will have to come directly from ticket buyers, of which there are currently none. It seems like a risky, almost impossible business plan. But who knows? People never know what they want until they already have it. And if the AAFL truly does what it intends -- if it creates a professional, lo-fi version of major college football -- it will immediately be more watchable than any pro sport that's currently in existence. Besides, there's at least one dude (who isn't related to me) who's very, very stoked about marketing this dream. This is how he responded when I asked, "Is the 2008 AAFL season 100 percent happening?"

"The league is 100 percent on for the spring of '08," Don Klosterman insists. "You can imagine the hurdles that need to be conquered, so is anything in life 100 percent? The answer, though, is 'yes,' 100 percent -- barring famine, WWIII or the sudden mass disinterest of football as we know it."

As a dedicated enemy of famine, war, and mass disinterest, I have no choice but to support the AAFL. But we'll see what happens.

Chuck Klosterman, whose latest book is "Chuck Klosterman IV: A Decade of Curious People and Dangerous Ideas," is a columnist for Esquire and a regular contributor to Page 2.

Fran
06-05-2007, 03:07 PM
one interesting comment

It also appears there will be no income from television (in fact, these games might be shown on public access TV without commercials).


That's not good at all so unless you have a team in your area your not going see any AAFL games. I hope that's not going happen.

Fran

SignGuyDino
06-05-2007, 05:04 PM
I'll ask the same question I asked one year ago:

Since this league insists on allowing ONLY college graduates to play, will I be allowed to WATCH this league, since I didn't finish college?

Will Microsoft be allowed to sponsor this league, given Bill Gates didn't even finish a year at Harvard?

This smacks of complete elitism, doubly hypocritical given that some programs are de facto pro programs with all the NCAA violations on gifts.

Taxpayers PAY for those fields and when they're not being used I don't see where any group gets off claiming that they will only allow college graduates to play. And frankly, there are others will would claim that this will discourage minorities because their graduation rates are lower right now.

There, I said it. I'm no PC guy but they would have a doggone good point here.

If they had a minimum age requirement to ENCOURAGE athletes to go to college, like 21 or 22, that's fine. The NBA does that with the D-League.

Otherwise, it's complete elitism. I would NOT support this league.

jwalters
06-05-2007, 05:31 PM
If we didn't have such a backwards sytem of upper-level education in this country your point would be null and void. But it does seem a little elitist. The truth is players who go to school on a scholarship really ought to get their degree. If you get everything paid for you have no reason not to unless of course you have a family situation. I think requiring an associates degree to play would be a fair compromise. But let's just go ahead and face it until we get cheap, highly subsidized, or for that matter free universal higher level education in this country there will be many people who go without a degree of any sort.

logoguru
06-05-2007, 06:11 PM
This is what unions are for =)

SignGuyDino
06-05-2007, 10:42 PM
#1Fan on www.uflfans.com made this brilliant point:

Also, they'll have to drag all those "college grads" away from higher paying jobs that they got as a result of their college degrees.

Yup. That sums it up. I know a guy who's a social worker who would have to sacrifice a good paying job if he played minor league basketball.

It makes no sense unless they can justify the pay. They already failed for this year. Seems to me they can't pay enough.

And it is elitist and they aren't budging. Another sign or elitism. And failure.

preeths
06-06-2007, 12:58 AM
Is a college degree a bona fide occupational qualification for a football player? Of course not, and if anyone wants to challenge it, the rule won't last long.

Shootmaster_44
06-06-2007, 03:32 AM
I don't see how having a rule that requires a college degree any different than the old WBL rule of having to be shorter than 6'5. All it does is create a unique niche for itself. I think if the AAFL succeeds, what you will find is the second tier NCAA players (i.e. those not guaranteed NFL jobs) completing a degree simply to provide a second option for pro football.

The one question I have is in regards to international players, such as those from Canadian schools. Many of those players end up graduating with 3-year degrees. Since they are recognized as having a Bachelor of Arts degree from that school, are they eligible even if they didn't complete a 4-year degree?

I did notice that on their webpage, it states all players currently on NFL Europa rosters but not under NFL Europa contract on July 3 and those on CFL and NFL rosters but not under CFL/NFL contract in September will automatically receive invites to try-outs. It makes no distinction about possessing a college degree.

I have a feeling that once rosters are announced and whatnot, that if people do some digging they will find that the league looks the other way on this one as far as star players are concerned. I think if your name is say Ricky Williams and you wish to play in the AAFL and you did not graduate from Texas (and I'm not sure he did) they will let you play. On the other hand if your name is Chris Sutherland and you did not graduate from Saskatchewan, you'll likely be told you cannot play. I think star power will come before academic credentials for the AAFL.

On another note, I wonder if the AAFL teams will be like the WNBA teams and take names that are similar to their counterparts? Will we see say the Gainesville Crocodiles or the Purdue Freighters? I hope they don't go with stupid names that are similar to the College names as opposed to going with names that would be marketable and give rise to nice merchandise, logos, uniforms etc. I also wonder if they have designs on putting a team on every NCAA Division 1A school campus? In a sense displacing the ABA as the largest "professional" sports league in North America. I certainly hope they don't have designs on 117 franchises (or whatever number Division 1A is currently at). I also hope they don't try and replicate the BCS and instead go with a playoff system.

If they model themselves more after the NFL than the NCAA and can replicate the NCAA football experience, I think they will be successful. I just hope they aren't banking on attracting 98,000 fans every week, as you subtract the students from that and that leaves likely 50,000. Of those 50,000 I have a feeling maybe half at best would come to AAFL games, so you'd have 25,000 fans in a stadium that seats 98,000. It would create a terrible atmosphere. A few CFL stadiums are used for CIS football in Canada and have the same effect. To the point where The Score television network refuses to broadcast games from there (unless they are contractually obligated to for playoff games) as the stadiums are too cavernous with 5,000 fans in a 30,000 seat stadium.

What the AAFL should do is have an agreement to use the soccer facility on these campuses for the games and if the crowds are too large for that stadium, then move to the football stadium. That way they can prevent a bad atmosphere from infiltrating their games. I may be overestimating the size of the soccer facilities on these campuses though. I assume they'd be the size of the MLS stadiums in LA and Columbus, roughly 15,000-20,000 seats.

Pounder
06-06-2007, 01:08 PM
Never mind the elitism nor the marketing strategy.

No matter how these people sell it, they're walking into an atmosphere where the college programs want all the money they can muster.. for themselves. It struck me that the stadia that gave a go to the plan (noting that the supposed Florida team was talking about using multiple facilities, which I find telling) represented schools that weren't powerhouses. In reality, the takers aren't the schools they're targeting, and that virtually guarantees IMO that cable access will be the best this league ever does... if it manages to exist at all.

College football fans, at least by my experience, are fans of the school FIRST. The football may come naturally, especially in the south, but I believe it is not overriding enough to merit this venture.