View Full Version : 2006-07 Divisions
toad455
05-09-2006, 08:23 PM
My guess is that they'll go with North & South divisions.
NORTH DIVISION
Arkansas
Colorado
Dakota
Idaho
Sioux Falls
Tulsa
SOUTH DIVISION
Albuquerque
Anaheim
Austin
Bakersfield
Ft. Worth
Los Angeles
flasah
05-10-2006, 09:47 AM
I think East-West makes more sense:
EAST DIVISION
Austin
Arkansas
Dakota
Ft. Worth
Sioux Falls
Tulsa
WEST DIVISION
Albuquerque
Anaheim
Bakersfield
Colorado
Idaho
Los Angeles
Or maybe three divisions:
EAST
Arkansas
Austin
Ft. Worth
Tulsa
CENTRAL
Albuquerque
Colorado
Dakota
Sioux Falls
WEST
Anaheim
Bakersfield
Idaho
Los Angeles
DWizards
05-20-2006, 12:21 PM
EAST
Arkansas
Austin
Ft. Worth
Tulsa
CENTRAL
Albuquerque
Colorado
Dakota
Sioux Falls
WEST
Anaheim
Bakersfield
Idaho
Los Angeles
I like the 3 divisions, but how about switching Albuequerque and Idaho. It would be closer for all the teams in the divisions, plus it would have the central division all old CBA teams, kinda like what the CBA did when the IBA merged w/ them.
hawk174md
08-30-2006, 12:06 PM
I like the 3 divisions, but how about switching Albuequerque and Idaho. It would be closer for all the teams in the divisions, plus it would have the central division all old CBA teams, kinda like what the CBA did when the IBA merged w/ them.
Better yet, why not try four divisions? Here is what I had in mind:
EAST
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST
rams80
08-30-2006, 02:09 PM
That's a little much, especially considering how that would leave you with only three teams per division.
johnnydr87
09-16-2006, 12:56 PM
Even better, how about 16 divisions?
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.