View Full Version : No stats of the NIFL in the new Almanacs this year...
12-23-2003, 02:43 AM
Just checked out the ESPN and SI 2004 Almanacs and I must say I like the ESPN one a little better then SI's. But I was disappointed that it didn't include any NIFL standings or simple stats in its book. But I will give credit that it did have CFL, NFLE, AFL and AF2 stats. It even had basic stats for the AHL and ECHL. I just hope someday that ESPN will include the NIFL and maybe even the IFL if it succeeds.
12-26-2003, 02:15 PM
what is the link to that.
12-27-2003, 06:30 PM
No link, I got this info from the ESPN 2004 Sports Almanac itself in a bookstore.
12-27-2003, 06:42 PM
ok-i will have to go look for this then, thanks
12-29-2003, 06:25 PM
They may consider it if the stats were even close to accurate, but they haven't been over the years, for some reason Lake Charles has the best stats? That is wierd. Anyway, they shouldn't even consider it until it is proven that they are accurate
They certainly haven't been yet! Like Facts Only said, they shouldn't be considered until they find a way to report them accurately league wide!
12-30-2003, 04:57 PM
Ya, you guys got a point. Although things are much better then the first and second year of the NIFL, the stats are still an area that needs work. I still find some inconsistancies with stats with a few teams. Some teams are doing great, but their are a few still that still don't do a good job. That is why many people would like too see some sort of League office of the NIFL as a way too contact media and report stats and stuff.
01-09-2004, 05:53 AM
BTW, what is the website for the NIFL? I can't seem to get any of the links off OSC to work?? :?:
01-10-2004, 01:28 PM
01-10-2004, 05:33 PM
Thanks. Maybe something was quirky on my other computer.
Website seems light years ahead of what it used to be, it used to be total junk.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.