ve] Lucky Vermont signed a deal with PlayOn (ADOTS) ABA" /> Lucky Vermont signed a deal with PlayOn (ADOTS) [Archi<a href="http://www.devils-shadow.com/forums/wii-iso-downloads/47653-kiss-death-wii-iso-downloads.html" title="Free Wii ISO Downloads">v</a><a href="http://www.devils-shadow.com/forums/xbox-360-isos/" title="Free Xbox 360 ISO Downloads">e</a>] - OurSports Central Independent and Minor League Sports Forums

PDA

View Full Version : Lucky Vermont signed a deal with PlayOn (ADOTS)


ABARedWhiteBlue
04-01-2008, 05:32 PM
http://www.abalive.com/news/releases/?newsid=2008040106001

ASK THE CEO - PLAYOFF GAME?

01-Apr-2008
Question from James in Barre, VT (and many others): Would you please explain what happened and the decisions made at the end of the Manchester/San Diego game at the Playoffs? (This question was asked in a variety of ways. If you attended the game or watched the game on PlayON! Sports, it was an amazing conclusion to a great game).

Answer: Everyone. Sorry for the delay in responding to your questions. Just returned from a fabulous Final 8 Championship Playoffs - and any of four teams could easily have won the Championship. As you know, Vermont defended its title with a hard-fought, close win over a very talented San Diego Wildcats team.

Now, the incident. With just a few seconds to go in regulation time, Manchester tied the score. With virtually no time on the court, SD went down, took a shot, missed, and a player tipped in the missed shot.
The referee said the shot was good - San Diego left the court and headed to their bus. Manchester (and many others) were very upset, feeling that the tip-in was after the clock hit zero. One players rushed off the court (unhappy) and pushed a ref; a coach pushed a ref - and there was a lot of yelling. The refs ran off the court also. The crowd, players, everyone thought they were leaving and that the game was over with San Diego the winner. Actually, the refs were going to the monitor that was located at the end of the court to see the last shot and tip-in. The monitor showed that the tip-in was after the clock had expired, but the ABA rule book does not have a provision for overturning the referee's final call. After looking at the monitor and replay, it was clear that the clock had expired and I made an on-court ruling that the game was a tie. While this made one team happy, and the other unhappy - my feeling was that the game should be decided on the court. We called San Diego back, gave both teams time to warm-up and decided to play an overtime period. However, there was no excuse for the player to push the ref under any circumstances and he was ejected. There was no excuse for a coach to push a ref and a technical was called giving SD two shot (they made one). And since it was the start of a new period (overtime), they jumped ball rather than possession - and SD ended up winning a very closely contested match. I will have to say that it was one of the most exciting 15 minutes ever in the ABA. You cannot imagine the passion from the teams, other teams, players , coaches, fans. Electric in any way. If you have a chance to see the tape on the PlayOn! Sports archives, do it. ABA action at its best. And thank you all for your great interest.

So, Joe changed the rules on the fly, overruling to on-court officials. Lucky he only attends about 4 games a year; otherwise all hell would break loose ('play 6 on 6!' 'no dribbling allowed!' 'dunks are worth 5 points!').

And, I wonder which TV feed he used? NeuLion? The world feed to Europe? His buddies at BASN? CoLours?

Finally, the funny part:

As you know, Vermont defended its title with a hard-fought, close win over a very talented San Diego Wildcats team.

Hey Joe - HOW THE HELL WOULD WE KNOW????? The damn score isn't even listed on the website, and if it wasn't for putting up Vermont's story, there would be NOTHING on the league site about its own championship. No photos. no MVP, no game recap, NOTHING.

Pathetic...

But hey, he's adding another team in Chicago, so he still has his priorities in order...

The Sweeper
04-01-2008, 05:57 PM
....And yet, this was in todays Barre-Montpelier Times Argus (from VT's play by play man)

"The concept is sound … but they need to get rid of the CEO/Founder Joe Newman. (Who all-of-a-sudden instituted video replay at the end of the fiasco that was the SanDiego/Manchester semi-final … then had to "bargain" with the Wildcats to get them off the bus to play overtime!)."

...And you said this...

"We called San Diego back,...."

Where does the truth lie? (Don't say 'Only The Shadow knows'.)